Iron Man…

19 May 2008 at 6:02 pm (Sloth) ()

…is a fun, fun, fun movie. I was surprised and impressed.

And to think, it started at such a disadvantage. For one thing, I tend to avoid summer blockbusters, mainly because I can think of more enjoyable things to do than share a movie with a hundred yammering, texting hooligans. For another, I don’t usually go for movies based on comic-book characters, especially after sitting through Batman Begins and Spider-Man 3. And anyway, I was never interested in Iron Man. He’s not a character I know, and he always seemed so inaccessible beneath that great metal mask and those two narrow slits that served for vision. Of course, this was before I discovered the infamous Tony Stark would be played by the inimitable Robert Downey, Jr.

That got me in the door. Yes, under all these yakkety and cynical trappings I am still a creature of desire, and whatever his personal issues were (or are), the man is a great actor. (Even though I haven’t been able to watch the movie again, his performance in Natural Born Killers just blew me away.) The movie was not without its flaws, but it was worth sitting through all of them just to watch Downey inhabit the character of Tony Stark, and to struggle with his transformation from freewheeling billionaire playboy to freewheeling billionaire superhero.

I’m trivializing. In almost any other actor’s hands, the character arc (and the series of events that precipitated it) would have been impossible to take seriously. But with Robert Downey, Jr.’s craft, it was flawed enough to be believable and touching without descending into mawkishness.

My one gripe has nothing to do with him or his character and everything to do with his charming young secretary, Pepper Potts. (Now there is a name that could emerge only from the comic book universe.) She is ably and gamely played by Gwyneth Paltrow in the face of some really terrible and inconsistent writing. From the very beginning, it is clear that Potts is capable, intelligent, glib, and utterly devoted to her boss. Her levelheadedness and ingenuity are unmatched, especially in an encounter with Tony Stark’s archnemesis. But every now and again, her coolness and cleverness are written away so that somebody else in the frame gets to look brave or smart. An otherwise compelling character is diluted so the writers don’t have to work as hard to make other characters look good, and of course it is the most interesting female character who suffers.

And I suffered for her. My frustration culminated in a scene where, flanked by federal agents, Potts discovers her entry card has stopped working. The scene asked me to suspend my disbelief in too many ways — not for the movie itself, but for Potts’ character. You see, by that point in the movie Potts and everybody on either side of the fourth wall has figured out why her card isn’t working, but Hollywood forces poor Paltrow to suddenly go bovine and mutter the obvious — “My card — it isn’t working.” — with no explanation or reflection about why that might be (hmm, archnemesis much?). This pathetic display was immediately followed by an inquiry involving the word “thingy,” requiring me to believe that a woman responsible for managing the great and intimate details of a weapon-manufacturing magnate’s life could suddenly revert to a squeaky, gleeful, valley-girl inspection of a bit of explosive putty.

But I don’t want to finish on that note. This was by any measure a great comic book movie, and I have high hopes for subsequent outings with both Tony Stark and Pepper Potts.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Almost Achieving Inspiration

13 May 2008 at 9:55 pm (Perspectives) (, , )

Okay, so I’m a bit late to the party, but really, what else is new, right? Being late to the party is the story of my life. I suffer from a sort of existential tardiness, always behind developmental schedule, wondering where everybody went. I imagine it’s how my brother felt when he had to repeat the 5th grade and all his friends went on to middle school, except it’s my life, there’s no syllabus, and all I can tell is that I’m somewhere behind where I’m supposed to be. Maybe that’s the real reason I can’t embrace open-world racing video games — they fail as escapism.

Anyway, to return to the particular lateness at hand: a few months ago, there was all a lot of web buzz about some “last lecture,” a funny and inspirational talk delivered by a comp sci professor at Carnegie Mellon. Really Achieving Your Childhood Dreams was delivered by Professor Randy Pausch on September 18, 2007. (Near as I can tell, the buzz came a few months later. I’m not that late. Usually. Sometimes.)

So I listened to the talk*, and I have to say — I’m not that impressed. Maybe I missed something, maybe I’ve already read too many Chicken Soup stories, maybe I’m just too depressed to appreciate the value of his advice. Professor Pausch has certainly led a remarkable and exciting life; he is clearly an intellectually formidable man in possession of creative powers, but the talk itself just wasn’t that impressive. It was kind of anticlimactic, really. It seemed too easy and pat for him to be giving that advice about brick walls existing to test how much you want something and gold being at the bottom of the crap barrel when he himself has led such a privileged life. He doesn’t seem to realize how much those privileges made possible, how many doors were opened to him before he had to learn how to reach for the knobs. Like an old acquaintance of mine, in youth he grew complacent and arrogant, imagining his good fortune to be his own doing instead of the happy roll of some third-party dice. Pausch admits to being introduced to this arrogance by a very wise man who would go on to become his mentor, but more than vestiges of it remain. This is one aspect of the talk that didn’t sit well with me.

The lecture was dissatisfying because the advice he gave, although peppered with well-timed and well-told funny stories, was common and easy and pat. It was the sort of pablum parents and teachers tell children to get them to do unpleasant things, the sort of speech you’d expect from a self-help writer shilling for his book. It sounded very much like an agglomeration of disparate self-improvement book chapters; some of it was common sense, but a lot of it was just common.

It was also discomfiting to see a man so close to death (he has been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer) seem so — flippant is the wrong word, maybe casual is better — casual about it. You didn’t get the sense that he was in denial; more that he was in denial about the mystery with which he was confronted, as though his coping strategy were to distill his impending demise into a series of funny stories and PowerPoint slides. Far be it from me to criticize someone’s coping strategy, especially in such a daunting situation, but he didn’t seem to be coping. He seemed to be diverting, working through a meta-coping strategy, coping with coping, admitting to certain death but somehow maintaining a gulf between the coping and the mystery. The lecture had the air of an elaborate, practiced avoidance; something about his body language and his face just didn’t seem quite honest. It was like he was folding in on himself, hiding by revealing; he exuded the same unsettling aura of fervent belief and unidentifiable dissembling as a motivational speakers whose success is still so new and fresh that he believes what he’s saying.

Pausch mentions that his mentor called him an excellent salesman. I think this is the most honest moment in the talk. He radiates this unsettling mix of earnest and disingenuous, and for that reason I can’t really take anything he says seriously — either I’ve heard it before, or it’s too pat. If your brain is that big, and you’re that confident and crafty, and you’ve had a stable family and a steady income and indulgent parents…. Well, you get the idea. There are so many reasons, so many variables beyond his control that governed what opportunities he had and what he was able to do. Of course, in the face of this final variable, the pancreatic cancer, the same one that took my grandfather (may he rest in peace) — what can he say? What is there to say? Man, say something. Don’t just stand there and talk about how we can achieve our childhood dreams as though talking your way onto NASA’s anti-gravity plane is something anybody can do if they just try hard enough. This is its own kind of evangelism, and there was something stripped and missing from the talk, and if anybody else can help me articulate it, or explain to me what and how I’m missing out, please, do.

*Those of you familiar with spiritual retreats — Christian ones, anyway — will remember “talks” as speeches about spiritual journeys and personal struggles. They generally revolve around an example of faith or courage, or the writer/speaker’s failure to set one, and the lessons, strength, and inspiration that can be drawn from that experience. Basically, “how to be in awe of/emulate X good person” or “how not to be a shmuck like me” and how God can help you with that. But this would better fit in another entry.

UPDATE:  I realized what was so unsettling about his delivery — it’s not just that Pausch was casual or flippant, as I had previously attempted to describe him — it’s that he seemed so emotionally unavailable, as though turning this experience into a lesson were his means of coping with unfortunate facts he has accepted only cerebrally.  I mean, what will his kids think, watching this video a few years from now, realizing that their dad couldn’t address them directly and so resorted to pretending to address a large crowd of mostly strangers instead?  But it’s late; more on this later.

Permalink Leave a Comment

10 May 2008 at 12:28 pm (Wrath)

Want to know the quickest way to alienate potential charitable donors?  Call them.  Use an automated dialer.  Get real snippy and bitchy when the person whose home you just invaded tells you to leave them alone.

I have no sympathy anymore.  Bad enough I get calls from congresspeople who never seem to realize I don’t live in their districts, right-wing organizations who think I’ll support their propaganda, and debt collectors who refuse to grasp that having the same last name as their target doesn’t render your responsible for said debt –

Maybe it’s irrational, and maybe I’m just spoiling for a fight, but these calls make me so angry.  I don’t care anymore.  I want to say horrible things to these people — call them ugly names, fling profanity at them, screech and howl and shriek into their ears, make them sorry they called, repulse and frighten them so much that they never call again.  I hate them, I despise them, I abhor them with the fire of a thousand suns.

May they burn in an endlessly ringing hell.  Wait, I’m the goddess of eternal damnation.  I can do that.

Welcome.

Permalink Leave a Comment